Survival Games

When I started play testing The Artifact RPG, some of its inspiration came from the movie Lawrence of Arabia. While the movie doesn’t center around survival, the crossing of the Nefud Desert is a great part of the movie. I wanted to make survival situations an interesting part of our games. I thought that story telling would be enough to use it to add flavor to the game. I was wrong and it almost universally backfired. Crossing a dessert is boring and there really is only one choice for the players “I keep going”. Rolls to test their will or endurance can only lead to eventual failure and are therefore despised.

Most other survival situations are met with similar reactions. The GM can describe the situation beautifully and compellingly but the players have only one option, keep going. So they disengage, their eyes glaze over and the game is lost.

Is It Hopeless?

I thought it was for a while. I’ve been thinking about it recently and now I’m ready to try again. My main thought is to take what is known to work in an RPG (combat) and use that as a model to make survival tasks interesting. Let’s look at the basic monster encounter. What makes it interesting? There’s something to defeat, maybe the PC get experience for it, the players get to test their characters and equipment. Some games also have the monster drop treasure, I’ve never played that way so it’s not a factor in my imagination but if you want the PCs to get gold for climbing a mountain, it makes as much sense as a giant lizard dropping money. Keep in mind, defeating a monster is not usually the purpose of the players (okay maybe it is for some) it is more likely that there is a goal somewhere beyond the monster and the same should be true for these obstacles. Another thing that makes a monster interesting is that the player’s rolls bring them closer to winning instead of just staving off failure.

So what does a monster have? They have hit points, they have attacks against the characters and they have defenses. Let’s give that to a dessert or a mountain, they need to be tweaked a bit first though.

Instead of hit points I’m going to give these obstacles Surmount Points (sounds weird to me, maybe Surmount Value? Let me know if you have a better name in the comments). Each successful roll will bring down the SP of the obstacle. The types of rolls would vary based on the type of obstacle.

Next the obstacle needs to have attacks. Each turn the players roll to surmount the obstacle it gets to fight back. In reality the obstacle is just existing and the characters are just experiencing it but the idea still makes sense. There is one caveat to this, the obstacle should not hit the players as hard as possible every time. In fact, most of it’s attacks should be easily weathered by the players. Major danger should only happen occasionally because the obstacle has no guiding intelligence (although in some games it could which is interesting in itself). Because of this the attacks should happen randomly.

Lastly the obstacle needs defenses. This consists mainly of things the players cannot do to defeat the obstacle. Some cliff walls may be unclimbable without a rope because they’re made of shale or very sheer rock. The PC cannot wait out a dessert (actually maybe you could, some have a rainy season). These will be very individual to each obstacle. The defenses could also have weaknesses (like the afore-mentioned rainy season) that a knowledgeable character could exploit.

The Take Down

So how does a character surmount an obstacle? Most of them are basic and any human of good health could attempt to surmount them. Special knowledge of the obstacle or survival techniques help a lot but should not be a prerequisite. Because of this base stats should usually be cited for resolution.

I’m going to also strongly suggest a system of success by degrees. I use this in The Artifact RPG system and I feel it will make this process far more enjoyable but it is possible to implement in most systems. Put simply there is a base success and a series of more difficult to achieve successes with the pay off for each increasing with the value of the success.

Here’s where things get a little weird. All characters have to defeat the obstacle individually. Here you can’t have the one guy that defeats the monster and everyone else gives a little support. In a sense each character has their own obstacle to defeat. However characters can help each other get past the obstacle so if one character fails his rolls and another character does exceptionally well, he can share up to half his SP for that turn with the other player.

Example Obstacle

I’m going to be using The Artifact’s system to set this obstacle up but I’ll include general notes to convert the effects to another system. I’m not super sure of the numbers here.

Desert

This region of very low precipitation leaves little in the way of drinking water and very little grows here so there is no food. Harsh conditions await anyone attempting to cross it.

Surmount Method: Carrying water and food to get across. Foraging while in the desert. Fast travel.
Surmounting Attribute: Constitution (or endurance)
Full 1/2 1/4 1/8
1 2 3 4
SP 1 per 5 Kilometers (usually more than 300 Km or 20 SP)

Hazards

Dehydration
For every survival round the characters face a dehydration hazard that can only be defended against by drinking 1 liter of water. If the character does not drink the required amount they get a -2 CDF to Con (or 5-6% of their endurance attribute). CDF penalties accumulate until the characters can eat, drink and recover for a period of time. If the CDF penalties exceed their Con the character takes one point of damage per round.

Exertion
For every survival round the characters face an exertion hazard. While walking on foot the character has to exert themselves this leads to further dehydration they get a -2 CDF to Con (or 5-6% of their endurance attribute) unless they drink another liter of water or making a successful Con roll.  CDF penalties accumulate until the characters can eat, drink and recover for a period of time. If the CDF penalties exceed their Con the character takes one point of damage per round.

Random Hazard

For every survival round the GM should roll once on the following table.
Roll 1D100
1-70 Blazing sun
71-75 Frigid night
76-85 Monotony
86-90 Ravine
91-95 Lost
96-98 Sand/dust storm
99 Sink hole
100 Oasis
Blazing sun
The heat is especially intense, the characters face an extra dehydration hazard this leads to further dehydration they get a -2 CDF to Con (or 5-6% of their endurance attribute) unless they drink another liter of water or making a successful Con roll.
Frigid night
The night is very cold. Without warm cloths or a fire the characters get a -10 to their Con.
Monotony
The boredom is getting to the characters, they must make a successful Psy roll or they cannot travel.
Ravine
A deep gorge blocks travel. Going around will take a trip of 30 Km. (Climbing down and back up the ravine would require a Ravine Hazard be made).
Lost
The characters have lost their direction for some time and didn’t notice it. Roll 2D6 and add that to the remaining SP.
Sand/dust Storm
A fierce storm blocks travel for a day and gives the following CDFs -10 Con, -5 Str, -2 Ref unless the characters are able to find or erect a shelter.
Salt Marsh
A salt marsh appears like an oasis but a telltale line of white salt surrounds the marsh. The water will taste salty which may warn the characters not to drink it. If the characters have lost Hit Points due to dehydration they must make a Psy roll to resist drinking the water.
Sink Hole
A sink hole opens up and swallows one character. They cannot get out by themselves but can be pulled out with rope or a human chain.
Oasis
The characters can drink as much water as they need and can refill their water supply.
Defenses and Weaknesses
Weakness: Rainy season 25% chance
There is a rainy season that makes 1D100% of the desert easily passable. The characters have to wait 2D6 months for the season to come.

 

 

16 Comments

Filed under Experimental Mechanics, Survival RPG

16 Responses to Survival Games

  1. I really like this concept in general. I haven’t checked out Artifact yet, so I can’t comment on your specific implementation. But, the theory is sound.

    I would suggest “Way Points” rather than “Surmount Points”. Rolls off the tongue better, and has an existing meaning that makes some amount of sense.

    In a lot of ways, this approach also closely resembles the skill challenge mechanic from 4e D&D. It is a bit more interactive, which has both its good and bad points.

  2. Loc

    Hmm. . . Way Points does sound better, I’ll think on that one because it would require a slightly different conceptual explanation.

    Ironically, this hazard is almost unusable for The Artifact. I’ll be making a cold desert for the game and I’ll be making more periodically. Our current game doesn’t lend to this but I’d like to test it out soon. I’ll post an update with the result.

  3. Sai

    Well this is nice. I have actually done a survival game before but it wasn’t really crossing a desert or anything, in fact the main point was to simply “survive” in one area, not going anywhere. Building a shelter, fending off animals, etc can be pretty fun. 😉 But these rules make things even more interesting.

    • Loc

      I’ll be posting new hazards from time to time, what hazards would you like to see? I want to do one for climbing rock walls and foraging for food, plus I’m going to a cold dessert because that’s what The Artifact has mostly.

  4. Sorry for dropping in late to the comments, but I enjoyed reading this. In my experience – for what it’s worth – the best way to handle a journey through dangerous territory is to create natural, flowing encounters that exist in that area and use them to define the journey’s high points (while keeping in mind the nature of the hazard itself, as your desert example shows).

    One of the best examples of this I’ve ever seen is actually a desert crossing, complete with sandstorm, in an old GURPS adventure titled, Caravan to Ein Arris. If you can find a copy, I highly recommend it for exactly this reason.

    • Loc

      Thanks! I’d agree, and I think that there should be other things going on during this kind of event, like other encounters (although they’d be rare in a dessert) to keep things more organic and flowing. I don’t want to turn the survival game into a dice rolling game but I do want to tie it into the PCs abilities and not make it feel like they’re being punished for failing rolls. I want them to succeed by making rolls.

  5. Pingback: Survival Games – Rock Wall | The Artifact RPG

  6. Pingback: Survival Games – Cold Desert | The Artifact RPG

  7. Pingback: Survival Games – Dense Undergrowth | The Artifact RPG

  8. Pingback: Survival Games – Swamp | The Artifact RPG

  9. Pingback: Survival Games – Cave | The Artifact RPG

  10. Pingback: Survival Games – Mountain | The Artifact RPG

  11. Pingback: Survival Games – Playtest | The Artifact RPG

  12. Darkholme

    I had a thought for the name of the points.

    Instead of Surmount Points, or Way Points, call them Headway Points.

    You get (basically) the same meaning you were originally going for, with the added bonus of still being able to write hp on the sheet.

    I very much like this concept though.

    • Loc

      Headway Points works very well linguistically. Although when abbreviated will be HP and therefore look like Hit Points. That could be good or bad dependent on your point of view. So far I’m looking at falling back on Story Points but feel free to use HP. Although Headway Points as HP has a familiarity to it. It would also work with my other use of the points which is my technobabble monster. One day I’ll put this all together in a PDF.

  13. Pingback: READER VOTING! Day 3 of 5 for the 2012 RPG SOTY | STUFFER SHACK

Leave a Reply